Wednesday, June 28, 2006

from capo beach

from the home office in capistrano beach, california...

last week had me pretty preoccupied between total music saturation, preparations for transcontinental vacationing and transatlantic job interviewing, now, midway though my vacation week i can offer the following snippets of observation. (all times PDT. the sunday-tuesday ones were either in emails to mark or commentboxes to jessica.)

[sunday 5:30 pm]
supershuttle came a-calling at 5am sharp. i'd slept thru my alarm and numerous phonecalls by the supershuttle guy: in my dream the phone was ringing and it was somebody from a video store or something and i did not want to talk to them so i just let the phone ring. lucky for me supershuttle guy didn't just give up and drive off. you'd be surprised how busy natl airport is at 5:15 am on a sunday. needless to say until i could get some breakfast and coffee into me on the dallas layover, i was not a happy camper.

[monday 1:42 pm]
cloudy this morning but the haze has burned off! gonna have a late lunch now and walk the length of the beach as seems fit. and yr right it's freakin chilly at night!

[monday 11 pm]
man wish y'all cd be here, you and all my friends. i mean i know it's no big deal for you and lorraine to go to the beach, now. i've not been to "the beach" since 1999. it's tres bon: fire, surf, heat, chilliness, drinks etc...

[tuesday 10:40 am]
the families have gone off on separate day trips today: my sister and nephews to disneyland, their cousins to the san diego zoo. so i'm holding down the fort, cleaning up the place a bit, doing some laundry, having leisurely breakfasts, checking emails and airfare to london on the patio overlooking the surf. indeed cloudy and chilly today, think i even felt a few light raindrops. will it burn off? or does it most of the time?

thinking i'll probably catch the OCTA bus to san clemente this afternoon, there's a used bookstore and a few thrift shops there, mebbe find myself a little late lunch spot...

driving around w/my sister yesterday late afternoon to and fro a target store in/around laguna hills and laguna niguel -- everything is freakin brand spankin new around here. even the 7-11s look freshly scrubbed. and all the residential property is up on these lovely hills. like, there's hills everywhere, and all the hills have these lovely residential properties on them: no residences anywhere else, nothing on the lovely hills but lovely residences...

[tuesday 5:40 pm]
sounds like i left the east coast at about exactly the right time. not a drop of rain here in capistrano beach california. (well not true: i think i felt a few around 11 am today.) mornings have been cool and overcast but the clouds have typically been burning off by 1 or 2 in the afternoon, and then things heat up quite nicely into the low eighties and stay that way until a gorgeous sunset moves in, by which time we're about ready for a beach bonfire that makes it continue to feel like daytime warmth even while away from the fire a sweatshirt is usually in order.

[wednesday 4 pm]
san clemente was strange, not much to it really. a few restaurants, none too extravagent looking. bookstores and thrift stores offering nothing to really speak of. surf shops and surf board shops. an unused parks. a pocket of light industry: janatorial and restaurant supply company, a sandal factory. guy sleeping in a pickup truck camper. a woman eating in her car. the OCTA bus made no stops along the PCH between the major intersection a mile away and the san clemente train station 5 miles in the other direction (antithetical the DC buses which stop every block.)

fancy dinner tonight at the montage, laguna beach.

[thursday 12.40 pm]
dinner at the loft, montage resort and spa's casual gourmet restaurant, was quite something. (rooms there start at $420/night). bill and lisa and i shared everything. our three starters were: 1) pan-seared maine diver sea scallops and sherry glazed pork belly garnished with a sweet cream corn and, curiously enough, a few pieces of popcorn; 2) carpaccio of ahi tuna, garnished with coconut curd and lime jelly, and a caper-cilantro salad; and 3) vanilla butter-braised lobster served with cured lemon and ricotta agnolotti in a citrus sauce. the scallops and the tuna were in a close tie for my favorites, but since i'm not generally inclined to go for raw fish i'll give the tuna the edge, it was a really wonderful surprise to me. the lobster was not bad, hardly, it's just the citrus flavor, mild as i was, sort of dominated and i never caught too much vanilla.

we shared two salads: 1) a shaved braeburn apples and celery heart salad with rocket greens, goat cheese and golden raisin emulsion, and 2) a salad of summer melon and peppercress with crispy prosciutto, muscat grapes and chili infused honey. #1 was tasty, celery dominated but it was all a little too saturdated with what was i guess the golden raisin emulsion, sweet but rather indistinct. #2 won hands down in my book: a variation on the old melon and prosciutto favorite, the chili-infused honey gave this all a subtle but powerful sweet-hot.

for the entrees we could not pass over this signature dish: 28-day dry-aged coffee-crusted new york strip, served with fourme d'ambert cheese (close to a blue) and wild arugula and a bourbon-caramel garnish. yes it was as awesome as it sounds. two of those please, and we also threw into the mix a crispy meditteranean loup de mer (a mild whitefish i'd never heard of before but was quite tasty) served with maitaki mushrooms and mint and garnished with a sun-dried grape puree, which was also quite a surprise and went quickly. desserts included a chocolte and meyer lemon sampler platter, something that they called "candied toast" that even our waiter had never tasted or served to anyone, it turned out to be like a hunk of briche that had been soaked ot infused with a mild chocolae of some kind, served over a kind of pistachio butter and beneath a dollop of guiness (yes, the irish stout) ice cream. by far though the show-stealer dessert was the pineapple upside-down cake: take your classic 1950s brown-sugar-soaked dole pineapple rings and betty crocker yellowcake mix, tasty as it is, and now ramp it up by about fifty degrees of decadence (and for brown sugar substitute butterscotch) is really all i can say. trust me.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

tapscott awakened

the overwhelming joys of trolling through my music and book haul from a week in NY/NJ has commenced! i tore through some great books of poetry on the busride home including julie kalendek's 1992 burning deck chapbook the fundemental difference, a very early potes and poets chapbook by dan raphael called zone du jour, catherine wagner's excellent 2001 fence book miss america and dennis phillips' 1989 sun and moon book a world. also been playing the bob dylan song for bonnie: the minnesota hotel tapes last night (really great early early unreleased stuff) and this morning and all 14 van morrison LPs 1968-1983 on mp3 shuffle during the day today (forgot how much i loved that stuff). started in on the sam rivers trio stuff (w/ doug mathews and anthony cole), beginning with 1995's concept: there's a compliation CD in the works there that i'll make at some point for anyone who would like to know what rivers has been doing in this format, so central to his work since the early 1970s.

tapscott giantbut by far the most stunning thing to hit my stereo upon returning from NYC has been the giant is awakened by the 1969 horace tapscott quintet. tapscott is of course the long under-recognized LA-based pianist who in 1961, four years before the AACM was chartered in chicago, formed the union of god's musicians and artists ascension, a community-building effort designed to foster musical and creative opportunity for african-americans (UGMAA) in the watts neighborhood of LA. my only exposure to his music has been the wonderful 1989 live quartet date that hathut reissued as a double CD, the dark tree, the rest of his sizeable output being quite difficult to obtain.

tapscott's playing and composing has a powerful and hypnotic effect, and as this recording proves, it's there from the very beginning. and it's not only the fact that the song "the dark tree," built on the coupling of wonderful bass and piano licks and given two magisterial extended readings on the hathut set, is also present here on this first leader date. the title track of "the giant is awakened" likewise has this utterly hypnotic descending and ascending figure that always begins with a quintuplet figure hammered out in wicked unison intervals by the bass, piano and percussion -- over which soars the rising battle-call triplets of arthur blythe's alto (making an early if not his first recorded appearance). Listen to a 30-second mp3 sample (491K) to get a taste of the 17+ minute performance. there's also a tune credited to blythe here called "for fats" (waller obviously) that reappears later on his illusions record under the title "miss nancy."

tapscott's recordings are horribly underserved by the compact disc market right now. the giant is awakened was reissued on CD by novus in 1991, coupled with flight for four, a john carter and bobby bradford quartet date from 1970. (the cover photo shows carter, bradford and tapscott from left to right). it's way OOP at this point. and if it's possible to have your catalog even more poorly served on CD than tapscott's, that honor might very well go to john carter. of his four co-lead dates with bobby bradford that were issued by the revelantion and flying dutchman labels from 1969 to 1971, only two have ever made it to CD -- flight of four and seeking (both 1969), the latter of which came out in the now-deleted hat art 6000 series. the other two, self determination music and secrets, remain unavailable. bertrand over at bjazz has documented all this and more quite nicely. anyone interested in sharing this music should contact me.

we can only hope that with the publication of steve isoardi's book the dark tree, which contains a CD of all unreleased music and that i'm very much looking forward to taking on as some summer jazz reading, interest in tapscott will reawaken.

the big trip out west, part two

more from my diary of the trip my family took out west 30 years ago when i was not quite nine years old...

[Sun June 6]

Dear Diary, Sorry I didn't write last night but I was tired. We woke up at 7:30, had breakfast about 8:30, & left for Mesa Verde National Park at about 9:30. Really we're going to stop at Durango. First we went through Pueblo & went on U.S. 160 which leads us to Durango. We stoped at a place called Big Meadows Campground near the Summit of Wolf Creek Pass (elev. 10,857 ft.). We stoped, looked around & had supper (Hamburgers, soup, & milk). I almost forgot! We went through Cave of the Winds. It was really neat! They had naturally made rocks in different shapes, & sizes. They had lights that made it look different colors.
                         Well, that's all, folks!

big meadows

[Fri June 11]

Dear Diary, Sorry I didn't write but we've been doing things at night. We went through Mesa Verde Nat. Park. They has a show at night called the "Amphia Theatre." It was nice. Then we went to Walnut Canyon Nat Mon. Then We went up to Grand Canyon Nat. Park. We saw the Grand Canyon! (WOWWWW!) We are now at the South Rim. We'll probably stay here for a few nights. So far it's really pretty. Now were on our way to find a campground. These people let us have part of their campsite. (HOW NICE!) We had steak with bread & salad for dinner. (YUMM!) We had a campfire with the people. We made "smores." They were good. Then we went to sleep. Bye!

mesa verde

[Sun Jun 13]

Well, We woke up about 6:45 & left for mass. We fooled around in the Visitors Center & left for the North Rim. It's about 215 miles away. When we got to Desert View, I took a picture of The Grand Canyon & ate brekfast. Then we left for North Rim. Then I went to sleep for about 4 hours. When I woke up We were look for a place to camp. We are in an overflow area. We have a nice spot. Then We built a place for a campfire. Then We went to look for firewood while Mom cooked supper. We found a good bundle. Then we had supper. Then we sat by the fire. Then we made popcorn. It was good.
                         Well, That's all, folks!

Grand canyon


[Mon Jun 14]

Well, We woke up about 8:45, ate brekfast & went to the North Rim. Then We had lunch. I has cheese 'n crackers & part of Lisa's yougurt. Then we took a 5 mile "tennis shoe" hike (UGHHHH!) We were pooped. Then we cleaned up and went back to are campsite. Then Mom started to cook dinner. Then I washed my ICKY feet! Then we had dinner. Soup and Poor Boy sandwiches, (YUMMMMMMM) & pudding for dessert. Then Mom started writing letters. Then I started writing in here. Now I'm going to unroll the sleeping bags & go to sleep.
                         Well,
                                That's
                                       all,
                                              folks!


[Sat Jun 19]

MGM grand

Dear Diary, Sorry I didn't write but the last few nights I was doing things at night. Went through Las Vegas, (NEAT-O), saw Caesar's Palace (WOWWEE) The Dunes (GREAT) & The MGM Grand. (GOLLY) We stayed at the Hacienda Camp Inn. Then we left for Disneyland. We went through Barstow, Riverside, Yermo, & Victorville. Then we got to Anaheim & Disneyland. We found a KOA Kampground & are staying there. Then Mom started to cook supper. We had a Ravioli caserole. It was good. Then after supper we went swimming. (YEAHHHH!) It was fun. Then we took showers. Then We went to sleep.
                         Well,
                                That's
                                       all,
                                              folks!


[Mon Jun 21]

Dear Diary, Sorry I didn't write last night but we went to Disneyland. It was really fun. Today we left Anihiem & went to Riverside to see if we could get our door fixed. We got it fixed. (YEAHH) Then we went shopping. We got all sorts of stuff. Then we went on our way to Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks.
disneylandkings canyon

visionfest XI, part three

Sunday, June 18

popped briefly into the panel discussion on "Artist-Organized Presentations in Jazz: 1970 to 2006 and Beyond" to hear william parker talking about his experiences putting festivals together through the years and it strikes me as similar on many levels to the community building we try to do here in terms of alternative poetries. i think of helping william carry in those big foil pans of chicken he made and brought the other night and how it's as much about that as it is the music. he said at the panel discussion how there's always some people who just want to have a gig and won't do anything else; parker's the kinda guy who gets people gigs AND feeds em chicken.

i was out and about running errands part of the afternoon and also meeting up wtih anselm and karen who were putting me up at their place just five blocks from the oresanz center sunday night so i could bus straight outta port authority monday. so i only caught a bit of the string trio -- Miya Masaoka (koto, electronics), Silvie Courvoisier (pno), Peggy Lee (cello) -- but didn't feel too bad about it since i'm pretty sure i've seen masaoka at previous vision festivals. always a useful reminder tho of the long and rich traditon of improvisation in asian musics.

i did make a point of being back in time for Kidd Jordan (tnr sax), Joel Futterman (pno), William Parker (bs), and Alvin Fielder (dr) -- and quite a whorl of sound produced by this band as one can imagine. futterman particularly impressed me: i have him on a leader date for a german label that featured jimmy lyons in one of his last performances. futterman is a figure who literally looms large behind the piano (he must be six foot four) and pounds away to create a wonderful ringing din. in fact i've never seen a pianist's hands move so perpendicularly to the keys (and parallel to the run of the keyboard) before: he literally swept his arms sideways along the keyboard. jordan's tenor playing was certainly fiery but a little to unvarying for my taste: he'd hit a certain height in the upper register and stay there, go back down, back up and stay there, etc.

i skipped out on the next set -- Patricia Nicholson (dance), Hamid Drake (perc), William Parker (bs and sintir), Jo Wood Brown (visual artist) -- and the beginning of the next set -- Whit Dickey Trio: Whit Dickey (dr), Daniel Levin (cello), Matt Moran (vibes) -- to have a homecooked pasta dinner at anselm and karen's before we all walked over to the orensanz center. i regret not seeing the dance with formidible accompaniment, along with dickey who's one of the more interesting drummers on the scene, playing in the DSWQ and now frequently featuring rob brown in his groups. but hey, you gotta eat.

and we arrived in plenty of time to secure seats for the feature act of the week, the final US performance (tho we have it with some good authority that this may indeed not ultimately be the final US performance) of the david s ware quartet. ware himself is such a commanding figure, and this is essentially a band that has been together for sixteen years, so minimal verbal is needed between these guys. nevertheless, there was a sense of unpredictability to the whole performance: ware picked numbers, cued soloists, stopped and started in places and ways that certainly had me constantly guessing and seemed even to have the band guessing too. i have to say that i was not moved to the degree that i was upon first hearing the DSWQ at the visionfestival three years ago, but it was still a command performance. every time he picks up the horn and puts it to his mouth you know you are in the presence of the higher powers. shipp and parker took an amazing duet, and ware gave brown an extended drum solo with no recap. "mikuro's blues" from go see the world was one tune i recognized, the third or fourth in the set, and there was another i recognized but will have to scan through my collection to get the title.

in short, by no means a disappointment but the emotional highpoint of the week for me was clearly the gayle-parker-ali set from saturday night.

recap

sets i'd most like to hear again:
  • moncur wednesday night
  • rivers trio wednesday night
  • dixon/lewis thursday night
  • bang friday night
  • mitchell saturday night
  • gayle saturday night

players newly discovered:
  • noriko kamo (moncur piano)
  • james zollar (bang trumptet)
  • klaus kugel (slammin the infinite drums)
  • corey wilkes (mitchell trumpet)

players newly reevaluated:
  • warren smith (balafon!)
  • roy campbell (most classical/virtuoso sound of the free trumpeters)
  • doug matthews / anthony cole (far more than just rivers' rhythm section!)
  • craig taborn
  • sabir mateen

players i want to hear more recordings of:
  • khan jamal (vibes)
  • bill dixon (trumpet + electronics)
  • ernest dawkins (reeds)
  • sam rivers trio (thanks kevin!)

pet peeves:
  • people who save seats in the front rows the whole evening but don't use them until the last set
  • too many XL and XXL t-shirts, not enough S and M (if any!)

Sunday, June 18, 2006

visonfest XI, part two

just now up after a late night at the visionfestival XI last night and quite a fest it's been with still one last night and the david s ware quartet to go.

Friday, June 16

i started in with Bindu -- Hamid Drake (dr), Sabir Mateen (rds), Daniel Carter (rds, trpt), Greg Ward (alto sax), Ernest Dawkins (tnr sax) -- who as i recall did two numbers, maybe three but the first two stood out in my minds anyway and i did not take notes. the first was a medium-tempo blast with drake behind the kit and for the second number he sat behind tabla drums and cooled things down a bit. ward was the youngest of the bunch and he reminded me of jimmy lyons not quite in tone but in the way he continually worked the middle register of the horn without going out for the pyrotechnics of the upper registers. dawkins was very impressive, played with a lot of fire, definitely need to check out more of his work. carter is someone whose work is starting to come more into my attention (for example his lead role in william parker's painter's spring recording) but for some reason his playing in stood out the least for me in this set, i mean i do remember him playing a decisive role in the performance for what is essentially a reed quartet with percussion. mateen though stood out loud and clear: i've heard him perform a couple of times, once with raphe malik at UMD i think and then at previous visionfests over the years, and always thought him very competant if not altogether distinctive. but this week he has really cut through with serious showstopping pyrotechnic on tenor and alto. bindu has a CD out on the french rogue art label and i don't know how permanent a group this is (drake is afterall one of the busiest guys on the scene) but definitely worth checking out for the unique and accomplished lineup.

Rob Brown Quartet -- Rob Brown (alto sax), Craig Taborn (pno), William Parker (bs), Gerald Cleaver (dr). brown is one of my fave altos on the scene and he's been busy in the studios, especially for the portuguese clean feed label, on which i've fallen behind and so was eager to hear what he's been up to. this is a formidable group, so much so that brown may have actually upstaged himself in putting it together. his compositions were to my ears some of the best of the festival: a medium groove 5/4 piece, a medium-fast out-of-tempo rising disjointed melody, and a slower darker broding kind of piece with just enough brightness coming through the cracks. while the whole band certainly rose to the occasion, taborn really impressed. i've seen him before, in a trio with susie ibarra and jennifer choi at the sackler gallery at the very least, but here he really excelled -- great speed and power, cross-handed work, inside the piano stumming and plucking, and just a touch of electronics to color the proceedings.

Billy Bang Quintet: Billy Bang (vln), James Zollar (trpt), Andrew Bemkey (pno), Todd Nicholson (bs), Newman Taylor Baker (dr) -- i've seen billy bang on a number of occasions and he's always a joy to watch, but this set was also outstanding. it never struck me as expicitly before (thought perhaps it has subconsciously and i never noticed it) how much bang's recent melodies have an oriental inflection, coming as they do out of his vietnam experience. but quite literally these pizzicato melodies sound very much like they could be coming off a japanese koto-type string instrument. thus no matter how much they may go to and exceeed the outer reaches of the changes, bang's performances always have a strong grounding in melody and derive much of their appeal from this. zollar is a great discovery for me, possessed as he is of a remarkably big brassy tone, and bemkey's lyricism reminded me very much of mccoy tyner's in places.

Saturday Evening, June 17

Slammin' The Infinite: Steve Swell (tmb), Sabir Mateen (rds), Matthew Heyner (bs), Klaus Kugel (dr), John Blum (pno) -- this is a band with which i had limited prior familiarty, mateen being the only player i knew and who again immediately rose to the occasion and cut through with some blistering playing. i found swell's playing very competant but did not stand out very much for me, clearly a lot of energy going into the playing all the same. blum and heyner made an interesting team: both younger guys both posessed of serious chops, the former nearly flailing away as he attacked the keys and the latter going at the fretboard with both hands like some heavy metal band (the long black hair adding to this image i suppose). blum i thought was perhaps the most inexperienced in terms of his comping cutting too much into the soloist from time to time, as if he's still learning how to show off his chops but and still give enough room and deference to the soloist. most impressive of all in this group perhaps tho was kugel (far right), clearly a very european drummer poised perhaps midway between the speed and color of lovens and the power of nilssen-love. i noticed most of all the lightness and quickness of his cymbal work and incredible hand speed. total economy of motion as well, every bit of energy being directed into the music.

Roscoe Mitchell Quartet: Roscoe Mitchell (rds), Corey Wilkes (trpt), Harrison Bankhead (bs), Vincent Davis (dr) -- you know, there's simply no one else who even approaches the area mitchell continues to explore. as if to say, sit back new yawkers and lemme show y'all how we do it in chiCAHHHgo! and it's not just the incredibly broad tonal range he possesses on soprano and alto or his ability to "deconstruct" melody, to take a line and splinter it into any number of directions. and of course the circular breathing technique he has mastered allows him to do this (splinter and graft) simultaneously for as long as he seemingly wishes. add to all this his fellow players: bankhead, again like billy bang the other night able at once to evoke a roots-music sound that makes his instrument sound like something from another african or asian culture and then also at the same time show a remarkable western virtuosity; davis, so powerful a drummer that his kit literally would not stay on the floor, so frequently did he have to stop playing one drum in order to bring it back closer to him; and wilkes, now let's just say a couple of things here. the generosity, first of all, of mitchell putting a young player and student up there on stage as an equal. and secondly, wilkes has the chops to step into that equal footing and, dare i say, upstage the master? i mean, i was thinking the other day about extended brass technique (relative to lewis and dixon) and thinking, since no one's done it to my knowledge before, it must not be possible to circular breathe on a brass instrument. no sooner do i think this than wilkes goes and does it. and what else does he do? he pulls a kirk. that's right, he plays two trumptets (or rather, a trumpet and flugelhorn) simultaneously. trust me, wilkes is going places.

i had to cut out on the next two acts -- a joe morris (gtr) & barre phillips (b) duo, which i woulda been much more receptive to earlier in the evening and before the energy music of the previous two acts; and a jason kao wwang (vln) quartet in part just to decompress and not run the risk of saturation/overload. i wanted my full faculties for By Any Means: Charles Gayle (tnr sax), William Parker (bs), Rashied Ali (dr). earlier in the evening kevin and i say gayle and i spoke to him for a minute, asked if he was going to play tenor or piano or a little bit of both or wait till he got on stage to decide, and he said "no, no tenor!" apparently he switched to alto two years or so, i asked him why and he said something like the tenor had gotten "too hot" and he needed to put it down and try something else for a change. indeed, with gayle's reputation as the most ferocious tenor on the block -- one that belies his very sweet and personable demeanor -- i could not imagine what he was going to do on alto unless it would literally melt or crumble away in his hands. well, this trio turned in perhaps the most moving performance of the festival. a lot of the biting and barking fire that gayle used to put into the tenor is still there on the alto, but i think the fact that it's a smaller horn has forced him to find or rediscover, believe it or not, a lyricism. the second of three pieces, a ballad, was so profoundly filled with the cries of human spirit, the kind that only coleman evokes on "lonely woman" and dolphy evokes on "god bless the child." that and also just to watch the two other masters, parker and ali, was worth the price of the whole weekend.

tonight still awaits...

Friday, June 16, 2006

visonfest XI, part one

many great books and CDs picked up along the course of summer vacation version 1.0 so far and surely more to come, but now from the home office in plainsboro, nj comes this first quick report on the vision festival XI.

Wednesday, June 14

Sam Rivers' Rivbea Orchestra -- a 16-piece group that rocked more than they swung, but they rocked hard. played four pieces i think, and with each one my ears grew more accustomed. at first it sounded like rock or modern composition chaos, and in fact i was drawing parallels in my mind to a 20th-century symphonic piece with big masses of indifferentiated sounds. eventually things sorted themselves out more, rivers' compositions frequently turning on big riffs. not much section writing that i could tell, lots of good parts for soloists tho -- the trumpters all with big sounds that could cut through the throng, and three of the reeds players standing out for me: david pate on tenor, chris charles and daniel jordan on alto. note: rivers is 82 years old and as brilliant as ever.

Grachan Moncur III Quartet w/special guests -- this was an absolute treat. three tunes in the set: a medium-slow loping groove of a tune co-authored by moncur and the late great jackie mclean, and then two covers of classic material from the miles davis quintets, "footprints" from miles smiles and (at the audience's urgings for more music) "so what" from kind of blue. the first tune just simmered and smouldered along, with noriko kamo's monk-like comping and soloing on piano interplaying marvelously with moncur and khan jamal's vibes. moncur was the epitome of class and restraint (golf shirt and cap to boot). jamal's fierce swing countered his seemingly stoic demeanor and appearance (shaven head and face), with only some mic trouble on the high end of his vibraphone marring this performance. byard lancaster did not make it unfortunately, but a guitarist whose name i did not catch filled in with remarkably clean and dexterous lines. rhythm section -- calvin hill (b), richard pearson (dr) -- grooved and swung hard but with, again, a kind of classic restraint. this set woulda sat comfortably at blues alley or birdland, or on a blue note record. moncur seemed to have embouchure trouble on the last piece, and the group as a whole seemed to have a hard time knowing how to end the pieces, the flipside of this of course being that they coulda played all night. and none of us woulda minded one bit.

Warren Smith Ensemble -- i've seen smith before, at sangha cafe in takoma park with bill cole i think, and this six piece gave him a chance to air his own compositions. personnel changes here too, all of which i did not catch, but you had andrew lamb (tenor sax), roy campbell (trpt), jaribu shahid (b), one guy playing french horn and another playing a bass trombone (never seen or heard one of these, looks like a regular trombone except the part behind the player's left shoulder doubles back on itself the same way the top of a bari sax does). two pieces in this set, the first being rather restrained free-tempo piece that never really got off the ground for me (seemed to be a lot of talking b/w band members during, stuff they maybe coulda worked out in advance?), but the second piece was quite something: "a gift from william" [parker]. seems smith has been babysitting a balafon at william's request (taking up too much space in his and patricia's place), so he wrote a piece featuring the balafon (african xylophone with wood keys and gourd resonators). smith stated the melody on balafon to open and close, the band (particularly campbell and lamb) building to a great crescendo groove.

Sam Rivers Trio -- again, this man is 82 years old. true, his tenor playing is not quite as fiery as it was say, i dunno, 30 years ago. but he's still spry and wry and full of invention. this is his working trio (also rhythm section of the rivbea orchestra), and a nimble and fleet rhythm section this is. they took opportunities to flex their muscle on other instruments as well -- doug mathews (bass, bass clarinet) and anthony cole (percussion, tenor sax, piano) -- like their leader, i mean, who else in the whole of modern jazz has been such a virtuoso on such different instruments (tenor, soprano, flute and piano) as rivers? tho i kinda wasn't paying full attention during their reed trio (sorry, this is after 4 straight hours of live music), well cole plays a mean piano, like rivers turning in a masterful ballad performance on piano.

Thursday, June 15

Paul Rutherford (tmb), Torsten Muller (bs), Dylan van der Schyff (dr) -- fantastic stuff, a model of european restraint and if i can say so classicism in free improvisation. these guys never raised their voices once but provided 40 minutes of continually inventive interplay.

Coltrane Tribute Band: Roy Campbell (trpt), Louis Belogenis (rds), Andrew Bemkey (pno), Reggie Workman (bs), Rashied Ali (dr) plus Steve Dalachinsky (poet). i have to say, even though poetry is my business, with a lineup like this i want to hear the music instead of the poetry. this set consisted of one long piece: bill seemed to think it was a coltrane cover but i was hard pressed to identify it as any single tune (tho belogenis was quoting plenty of discernable coltrane melodies under dalachinsky's recitation). campbell was incredible, convincing me more and more that he's one of the very premier trumpters of the moment, with incredible virtuosity and capable of a classic warm tone that is hard to beat. belogenis is a tenor to be reckoned with. i know him through his knitting factory duo recording with rashied ali: he takes coltrane as a clear model but does his own thing with it, piles on overtones very much like sanders, wright, ware and the other masters. plus he's extremely generous: he backs off when it's not his turn and then knocks it outta the park. bemkey is very interesting to listen to, esp towards the end when he strummed the strings inside the piano. workman is the master, a wide smile beaming from behind his shades, glissandi and strums and delayed arcos all in an africa/brass kinda groove. and ali of course the other master, tho again generously laying back and never stepping up for a solo.

i had to step out for some dinner and air during Maria Naidu (dance) & Dennis Gonzalez (trumpet), and then Day & Taxi as well (Christoph Gallio on soprano, Christian Weber on bass, and Michael Griener on drums).

but coming back for the last set of the night was quite something: Bill Dixon (trpt), George Lewis (tmb, elec) + Videosonic Projections. lewis of course has been the leading american pioneer of extended trombone technique now for probably 30 years (too bad he couldn't have share the stage with his british counterpart paul rutherford!) and likewise dixon who having formed the ny contemporary five with tchicai and shepp and then played on the cecil taylor blue notes has continued charting his own way into extended trumpet technique but probably getting even less recognition than lewis (which is to say not much). though dimming the stage lights and having no rhythm instruments to keep things moving made this a difficult performance to attend to at the end of the night -- actually had this been the 8pm show and the coltrane tribute band the late show, that woulda totally worked -- nevertheless this was utterly fascinating stuff. not only can these guys coax every bleep, blurp, dooweeet thhhhwip and brwawwwp out of their respective horns, but filter it all through various live electronic processing and you have an amazing palette from which to work. particularly, dixon's half-lip low tones evoke for me the 12-foot steel trumptets of tibetan buddhist monks, while his breathy thwips when caught in a delay loop could easily make the rhythm track for an piece of electronica dance music. there was a video projection as well as some found speech loops interspersed but they never really integrated into the performance for me. and like i said it was all a bit static for 11pm -- fun to think of what bassist and drummer you could add to make this a killer quartet -- but in terms of extended brass technique this stuff was primo. (like it makes no sense to me amplify and process a saxophone for example but makes complete sense to me for a brass instrument.)

tonight: hamid drake's bindu, rob brown quartet, billy bang quintet, henry grimes (who sat right behind us the whole night wednesday) with poetry. and then there's all day saturday and sunday. stay tuned!

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

the big trip out west

this summer marks 30 years since my parents, sister and i took our 22-1/2-foot dodge jamboree motorhome (something like the one depicted except ours had a dark brown stripe) on a 7-1/2-week trip across the country: from cleveland straight to saint louis to visit my cousins (on dad's side of the family) and then through the middle of the country to and into the southwest, all the way up the west coast from los angeles to seattle, through idaho to montana, wyoming, and then all the way back through the midwest along I-90. (i seem to recall we managed to buy gas at times for around 50 cents a gallon.)

i kept a rather incomplete diary in a perfect-bound red-and-blue striped "peanuts 1976 day by day" book that i had been given the preceding xmas and will reproduce it in its entirety here as the weeks go by. all spelling mistakes and idiosyncracies preserved, i mean hell i was not quite nine years old. so here goes...

[Mon May 31]

Yahoo! The trip begins! Were heading to St. Louis. We left about 9:00. We've been on the road for about 10 hrs. St. Louis is about 23 mi. away. Dad has his "ears" set-up. ["ears" = CB radio] All you hear are blabbermouths! I wish I could talk but I'm too young. We've passed through Indiana and Illinois. I can't wait to see Peggy & Greg. They are going to be in school & we aren't. After St. Louis, were going to Colorado. From then on I don't no. The Stohr's are moving pretty soon. It's going to be a big house. After our trip we might pick up Peggy & Greg & stay awile. I hope they do. We might pick up Grandma. I'll write tomorrow if I get time.
          See ya tomorow!


[Tues June 1]

Well, We woke up about 7:30, got dressed & had Pop-Tarts for brekfast. Then Greg & I played awhile. Then we has a blast buying 7 25c packs of baseball cards & 1 15c pack. we mixed them together & picked who we wanted. Then We played basketball. Then Lisa & Peggy went bike-riding. Then Greg & I got more money & bought more baseball cards. Then, we had bread for Lunch & played more basketball. Greg had to go for Little Leauge practice. Then we had dinner. Then we went to see Peggy's & Greg's games. Greg's team lost to Holy Redeemer, 11-5. Peggy's team won 35-10. Then we played more basketball. Then watched T.V. Then we went to the new house to sleep. Bye!


[Wed June 2]

Well, We woke-up about 7:00 & got dressed. A little later we left. We had brekfast. I dozed off at about 11:00 till 1:00. At about 2:00 we were in Kansas. We saw K.C. Stadium. We passed through Topeka, Kansas City, Abilene, and Salina. We went to Howard Johnson's And got Ice Cream Cone. Then we drove awhile. Then we stoped at Wilson State Park & had dinner. Mom said it was bad. I think it was good. Then on our way to a small hike, we met a lady. Then we went on our hike. Then Mom washed the dishes. Lisa & I get to sleep in the cab tonight. (YEAAAA) [cab = "cabover" = pullout bed above the cabin or driver's area of the vehicle]
          Well,
                    See ya tomorow.

wilson state parkwilson state park

[Thurs June 3]

Well, I woke up about 8:00, had brekfast at 9:00, & left Wilson at about 10:45. We went by Russell, Hays, & WaKeeny. A few hours later We passed the Colorado state line. Then I went to sleep for a while. Then when I woke up, we were about 83 miles from Colo.Spgs. We ran into a storm and then saw Pikes Peak. Then we were in Colo.Spgs. We then stoped to buy grocerys. Then we went to find a place to camp for the night. We have a spot at the Woodland Park KOA Campground. I think its going to be nice. We might get to cook out side. I hope we can.
                    Well, that's all folks!



[Fri June 4]

Well, I woke up about 7:30, & had brekfast. We took showers, & fooled around for awhile. Then we left for Pikes Peak at about 11:45. It was a very nice sight. Then we went back down. My ears kept poping! Then, Daddy went to look for a o-ring for the motorhome. Then, we came back to the KOA to stay another day. Mom started cooking supper at about 6:45. It'll take about a half an hour. We are having Porkchop Casorole. It sounds pretty good. Tomorow we might go around some places in Colorado.
                    Well,
                         See Ya tomorow!

meanwhile in afghanistan...

quotes and links follow, but the upshot is:
  • NATO and US troops deployments are on the increase
  • karzai is arming the warlords to help defend against the taliban
  • the taliban is the strongest it's been since they were deposed 5 years ago
  • record poppy harvest in afghanistan this season that will supply one-third of the world's heroin trade
NATO defense ministers today reaffirmed their plans to expand the alliance's presence in southern Afghanistan in the face of greater resistance by Taliban fighter and drug traffickers. NATO has been progressively increasing both the number of its troops and its reach in Afghanistan. The Afghanistan operation has emerged as a test of the alliance's ability to respond to security challenges far from Europe.[...] NATO has already deployed 9,700 troops in Afghanistan, and the number is expected to grow to some 16,000. Of that figure, some 6,000 are expected to be posted in the southern part of Afghanistan, one of the most restive areas in the country. (Michael Gordon, "NATO Moves to Expand Presence in Afghanistan," New York Times, June 8, 2006)

Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Sunday his government will give weapons to local tribesmen so they can help fight the biggest increase in Taliban violence in years. A U.S.-led coalition soldier and seven Afghan civilians were killed in the latest violence in the country's south, which has been hardest hit by the surge in insurgent attacks. Speaking to a group of tribal elders from eastern Afghanistan, Karzai said he did not want to form militias that could clash with rival tribes. "We just want to strengthen the districts to safeguard them from terrorist attack," he said. Although they would not speak for attribution because of the sensitivity of the topic, Western diplomats briefed on the plan said they worried it could fuel factional fighting by giving weapons to forces loyal to warlords with long histories of factional disputes. (Amir Shah, "Karzai: Tribesmen Will Help Fight Taliban," Washington Post (AP), June 11, 2006)

The Afghanistan province being patrolled by British troops will produce at least one third of the world's heroin this year, according to drug experts who are forecasting a harvest that is both a record for the country and embarrassing for the western funded war on narcotics. (Declan Walsh, "UK fears record Afghan heroin output," The Guardian, Tuesday June 13, 2006)

The U.S.-led coalition is unleashing more than 11,000 troops to attack militants in the southern mountains of Afghanistan, the biggest offensive since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. The push starting Thursday by U.S., British, Canadian and Afghan troops aims to squeeze Taliban fighters in four volatile provinces. It will focus on southern Uruzgan and northeastern Helmand, where the military says most of the forces are massed. The offensive comes amid Afghan and coalition efforts to curb the fiercest Taliban-led violence since the hard-line Islamic government was toppled for harboring Osama bin Laden following the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. The force of more than 11,000 troops is by far the largest deployed in Afghanistan for one operation since the 2001 invasion. Previous offensives in the country have involved several thousand soldiers.[...] Operation Mountain Thrust will involve about 2,300 U.S. conventional and special forces, 3,300 British troops, 2,200 Canadians, about 3,500 Afghan soldiers and air support troops, Freakley said. There will also be coalition air support.[...] Since the defeat of the Taliban regime in late 2001, the militants have gained strength, [military spokesman Lt. Col. Paul] Fitzpatrick said. "I think this summer the Taliban is stronger than they've been in years," he said. (Jason Straziuso, "Big offensive planned in Afghanistan," Seattle Post-Intelligencer (AP), June 13, 2006)

Monday, June 12, 2006

the seventh continent: fiction vs. fact

the seventh continentan average middle-class, white-collar austrian family is depicted in a typical day from three successive years. the last day, though, is anything but typical. problem is, they lead incredibly boring, mundane lives. they don't really live: they do stuff. feet go out of bed and into slippers, teeth get brushed, meals are prepared and eaten unceremoniously, work and school are attended. and so on the day of the third year we are shown, the family carries out their decision to put an end to it all -- for good. they sell the car, withdraw all their money from the bank, tell inquirers that they are emigrating to australia (hence the film's title), write a note to the in-laws, prepare one last meal and proceed to destroy all of their possessions before swallowing poison.

aside from the roughly ten minutes or so when we see the family ripping up their clothes, tearing up books and photo albums, breaking LP records, flushing all the money down the toilet and taking a sledghammer to all their furnishings (a sheer delight to watch!), my initial thought was ho-hum, postmodern nihilism, what a bunch of self-indulgent crap. even the scene where the husband upchucks his first round of poison and proceeds to guzzle a new glassful: how very sid and nancy i thought (1986, three years before "the seventh continent"). i nearly wrote the film off altogether. something, perhaps the titles at the end of the film saying the in-laws did not believe the family's suicide note and ordered a police investigation that turned up no evidence of foul play but was nevertheless listed the deaths as an unsolved case, compelled me to scan through the interview with director michael haneke and i'm glad i did. clearly the end titles did not sink in. this was not a pure fiction: haneke based the narrative on a newspaper account of a factual occurrence.

what is it about the factuality of these events that made me essentially do a complete turnabout in my feelings about the film? i can't really say, and i don't know that i've ever had an about-face like this in my impressions of anything. there's a brilliant moment in the interview where haneke talks about when this film was shown at cannes, the audience howled in protest over the money-flushing scene. haneke says the police on the scene found the money in the pipes and plumbing after the fact, which is how they knew the family attempted to dispose of their money this way. i mean, how stupid? clearly these people did not think everything through. but haneke remarks instead how telling it is about us that we can watch a family kill itself and not raise a whimper but destroy money and people cry foul!

the seventh continenti guess part of why i changed my feelings about the film is how the facticity makes it all literal while fictionality makes it too ironic? i'm not altogether sure how strongly i would recommend the film because it is rather painstaking -- unlike the majesterial deliberateness of bela tarr in "the werckmeister harmonies," "the seventh continent" borders on studied tedium. (in this sense it's closer to "the brown bunny" but without the blowjob.) but nevertheless i'll certainly check out the other two films in haneke's "glaciation trilogy" ("benny's video" and "71 fragments of a chronology of chance," also released on DVD from kino last month). there's also an interview with christopher sharret and an essay by matias frey online at senses of cinema that i'm going to check out.

Suicide is not asymmetrical warfare

Dear Editor,

When the commander of the Joint Task Force at Guantanamo, Rear Admiral Harry B. Harris, held a press conference at United States Southern Command in Miami this Saturday, he offered the following assessment of the suicides of three prisoners who were being held at Guantanamo: "I believe this was not an act of desperation, but an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us."

This perverse statement has not been as widely reported as it should be, and I suspect this is because the statement is not only a profound embarrassment to our military and our nation; it does not simply, as a New York Times editorial put it today, "reveal a profound disassociation from humanity."

If we live in an America that detains prisoners indefinitely without any semblance of due process, then calls their suicides an act of asymmetrical warfare against us, and then tolerates this statement as rational and reasonable, truly the terrorists have won. I urge you and your readers to denounce the statement by Rear Admiral Harris, call for a release of the full transcript of his Saturday press conference, demand that he account for his statement and urge the U.S. Army to review Harris' fitness for command.

[emailed to the following new outlets: New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune, Cincinnati Post, Columbus Post, Denver Post, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Chicago Sun-Times, Richmond Times-Dispatch, Seattle Times, Times-Picayune (New Orleans LA), Washington Times, Akron Beacon Journal, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Flint Journal, Idaho State Journal, Lansing State Journal, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Louisville Courier-Journal, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Pensacola News Journal, Peoria Journal-Star, Providence Journal, Reno Gazette-Journal, Salem Statesman-Journal, Sioux City Journal, Topeka Capital-Journal, Albuquerque Journal, Lincoln Journal Star, Wilmington News Journal, Winston-Salem Journal, Des Moines Register, Mobile Register, New Haven Register, Orange County Register, Register-Guard (Eugene, OR), Arizona Daily Star, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Indianapolis Star, Kansas City Star, Lincoln Journal Star, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Peoria Journal-Star, Tribune Star (Terre Haute IN), Wilmington Star-News, Anchorage Daily News, Champaign News-Gazette, Dallas Morning News, Detroit News, Duluth News Tribune, Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Greensboro News & Record, Knoxville News-Sentinel, New York Daily News, News & Observer (Raleigh NC), Rocky Mountain News (Denver CO), San Antonio Express-News, San Jose Mercury News, Savannah Morning News, Springfield News-Leader, Daytona Beach News-Journal, Delaware State News, Union Leader & New Hampshire Sunday News, Wheeling News-Register, Wilmington News Journal, Athens Banner-Herald, Boston Herald, Decatur Herald & Review, Grand Forks Herald, Herald-Dispatch (Huntington,WV), Lexington Herald-Leader, Miami Herald, Omaha World-Herald, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Sun Herald (Gulfport MS), ABC News, CBS News, Fox News Channel, MSNBC, NBC News, American Conservative, American Enterprise, American Prospect, American Spectator, Human Events, National Journal Magazine, Public Interest, Southern Political Report, Washington Monthly, Weekly Standard, Roll Call, Christian Social Action, New Republic, Sojourners, US News & World Report, Gannett News Service, Reuters America - Washington Bureau, States News Service, Talk Radio News Service, and United Press International]

Saturday, June 10, 2006

the common good platform

tom tomorrow on coultercontrary to my previous indication, there will be no post on "rightwing apologetic, part two" focusing on the defenses of the indefensible statements by the author of such books as slader, treason and godless since she is not even deserving of my even mentioning her name. interested readers should consult the dossier prepared by the fine folks at mediamatters.org.

i'd rather spend my own energies on more positive, productive endeavors -- particularly with respect to the "common good" platform that's recently come to my attention.

don't waste your time with michael grunwald's wapo op-ed piece from this morning. with a headline claiming it to be "A Step-by-Step Guide for Democrats" on "How to Reconnect With Voters and Realize Your Dreams of Victory," the piece boils down to the non-answer or non-advice of "do nothing," or: "don't listen to the pundits." (curious advice coming from a pundit. well i'll take it and won't bother with any of grunwald's subsequent columns.)

better yet, go straight to the american prospect and the series of articles being promoted under the banner of "the common good." start with michael tomasky's essay "Party in Search of a Notion," which ran in the may issue.

on some level tomasky's simply acknowledging the thesis, hardly original, that rights-based identity politics of the late 1960s and 1970s combined with the left's perceived or actual alienation of its traditional working-class constituencies have in large part contributed to if not altogether created the ongoing political and electoral failures of the american left. what's useful, and unique as far as i've seen, is how tomasky posits an actual value behind which a liberal progressive political agenda can be mobilized. it's specific enough to be easily intuited and yet broad enough to win popular appeal: the common good.

here's how tomasky sets it up historically.
The stance of radical oppositionism dissipated as the ’60s flamed out; but the belief system, which devalued the idea of the commons, held fast and became institutionalized within the Democratic Party. The impact on the party was that the liberal impulse that privileged social justice and expansion of rights was now, for the first time, separated entirely from the civic-republican impulse of the common good. By the 1970s, some social programs -- busing being the most obvious example -- were pursued not because they would be good for every American, but because they would expand the rights of some Americans. The old Johnsonian formulation was gone. Liberalism, and the Democratic Party, lost the language of advancing the notion that a citizen’s own interest, even if that citizen did not directly benefit from such-and-such a program, was bound up in the common interest. Democrats were now asking many people to sacrifice for a greater good of which they were not always a part.[...]

By 1980, Reagan had seized the idea of the common good. To be sure, it was a harshly conservative variant that quite actively depended on white middle-class resentment. But to its intended audience, his narrative was powerful, a clean punch landed squarely on the Democratic glass jaw. The liberals had come to ask too much of regular people: You, he said to the middle-class (and probably white) American, have to work hard and pay high taxes while welfare cheats lie around the house all day, getting the checks liberal politicians make sure they get; you follow the rules while the criminals go on their sprees and then get sprung by shifty liberal lawyers. For a lot of (white) people, it was powerful. And, let’s face it, manipulative as it was, it wasn’t entirely untrue, either!

here's the prescription:
The Democrats need to become the party of the common good. They need a simple organizing principle that is distinct from Republicans and that isn’t a reaction to the Republicans. They need to remember what made liberalism so successful from 1933 to 1966, that reciprocal arrangement of trust between state and nation. And they need to take the best parts of the rights tradition of liberalism and the best parts of the more recent responsibilities tradition and fuse them into a new philosophy that is both civic-republican and liberal -- that goes back to the kind of rhetoric Johnson used in 1964 and 1965, that attempts to enlist citizens in large projects to which everyone contributes and from which everyone benefits.

Arguing for it is the only way that Democrats can come to stand for something clear and authoritative again. It’s not enough in our age, after the modern conservative ascendancy, to stand for activist government, or necessary taxes and regulation, or gay marriage, or abortion rights, or evolution, or the primacy of science, or universal health care, or affirmative action, or paths to citizenship for illegal immigrants, or college education for all, or environmental protection, or more foreign aid, or a comprehensive plan to foster democracy in the Arab world, or any of the other particular and necessary things that Democrats do or should support; it isn’t enough to stand for any of those things per se. Some of them have been discredited to the broad public, while others are highly contentious and leave the Democrats open to the same old charges. And those that aren’t contentious or discredited suffer the far worse problem of being uninteresting: They’re just policies, and voters don’t, and should not be expected to, respond to policies. Voters respond to ideas, and Democrats can stand for an idea: the idea that we’re all in this -- post-industrial America, the globalized world, and especially the post–9-11 world in which free peoples have to unite to fight new threats -- together, and that we have to pull together, make some sacrifices, and, just sometimes, look beyond our own interests to solve our problems and create the future.

it's an appealing platform to me for all kinds of reasons. first of all, it acknowledges where the left went wrong and attempts to correct it. second, it's based on ideas, values and principles rather than polls. a number of liberals have been working on the values issue, including jim wallis and michael lerner. i've looked at the work of shellenberger and norhaus' before and was concerned that it was simply a slick poll-driven business model. i've had another look at the overview (PDF 183K) of their "strategic values project" (you can get a briefer sense of how it works here) and it does seem, like tamasky's essay, and attempt to (re)establish core liberal values, find a way to frame values and only *then* derive policy.

third, it's a set of values that practices what it preaches: constituencies skeptical of "liberalism" will see that liberal interest groups can set aside their immediate self-interests to advance the greater common good. it's a general principle from which all kinds of specific policy goals can stem: ending petropolitics as we know it, campaign finance reform, healthcare, etc.

The Emerging Democratic Majorityalso at the american prospect is a four-part essay by john halpin and ruy teixeira one "The Politics of Definition," touted as "a path-breaking and challenging new study on how progressives and Democrats can close the 'identity gap.'" i was not too taken with teixeira's co-authored The Emerging Democratic Majority, finding it a little too comfortable with its own demographic prophecies, but we'll look at what he and halpin have to offer and report back.

Friday, June 09, 2006

Tomorrow

We to your story, game and smugness, do add
This death, our death. We to the clown commit
The glory given us; we to the further, after-breath
Of fame declare our dividend of fire, our mite
Of trampled ash. We to that cavernous place
You call "our time," commend an anger charged
To rip the face of worlds so simply snuggling in
Above our rotted heads; we to the wiley saviors
Send warning, sound a war's depth
That shall be a stop to their stuttering guns,
That shall be a sound which no battle's strut can scare.

We were your only decent war; we were answer, aim.
We were that rooted story, Man's game. We to your bare lands
Lend prestige, dead. We to others' sons spell glory.

Kenneth Patchen
-- Kenneth Patchen, from First Will and Testament (1939)

18th st video

...formerly known as video americain, is closing in two weeks and going to new jersey. forcing the rest of us all to go the way of the netflix i guess. might as well go buy an ipod too...

-------------------

nice gentle summer afternoon thunderstorm here, march 16-20 playing in the background...

-------------------

weekend DVDs: watched the first three episodes of the wire, which strikes me as a pretty good cop show so far tho i don't know how compelled i am to watch more...

on deck, bela tarr's damnation, can't wait to see how it rates against werckmeister harmonies

and michael haneke's the seventh continent. thought this was a completely new filmmaker to me but it turns out i have seen his piano teacher.

rightwing apologetics, part one

...or, the last throes of rightwing sanity.

without positing any kind of moral equivalent, or measuring them against one another in terms of number of lives lost, or ignoring their clear and obvious differences, 9/11 and haditha are both unacceptable and unjustifiable takings of innocent human life. i would like to think this is something on which all reasonable people can agree.

what's fascinating to me is to watch the right wing increasingly self-destruct as it tries to argue its way out of various utterly untenable positions into which it has argued itself. some of these apologetics are easily refutable, but some are actually so perverse that they boggle my mind.

with respect to haditha, the standard right-wing line of defense has become "of course killing innocent civilians in war is wrong, but...."

and in every case, what follows the "but" serves as the excuse, the rationalization, the defense of why killing innocent civilians is not wrong, or at the very least that it's a wrong we are willing to accept. typically these apologetics take the form of some combination of the following: 1) americans are the exceptions to the rules of war, 2) nevertheless shit happens and war is dirty business, but 3) history will forgive us.

rich lowry ends his national review online op-ed piece, "If Marines in Haditha did what they are accused of, it’s a terrible crime unrepresentative of the American military. Period." but of course there is no period because his whole reason for writing the piece is to engage in apologetics. "No military in the history of the planet has ever been as observant of the rules of warfare and as discriminate in its use of force as ours," he writes in spite of plenty of evidence to the contrary. "But no large organization can be utterly free of weak or evil men." in other words, americans are the exception but sometimes succumb to the norm. lowry's brand of exceptionalism thus turns out to be no exception at all.

bill kristol reverses the usual order and starts off with the "but": "But here's the hard, Trumanesque truth" -- in the sense, one wonders, of harry truman or jim carey's film character who lives in a fabricated world of illusion? -- "In war, terrible things happen, including crimes and abuses and cover-ups. Let's be clear: Crimes and cover-ups cannot be excused or tolerated." but clearly they can. kristol would seem at first to be dispensing with american exceptionalism and serving up a "shit happens" argument pure and simple. don't be fooled; kristol is of course much smarter than lowry, so his brand of exceptionalism will appear more rigorous:
What makes us exceptional is that we stand for liberty, and that we are willing to fight for liberty. We don't need to "prove" we are different from the jihadists by bringing our own soldiers, if they have done something wrong, to justice. Of course we must and will do this. But our doing this "proves" nothing. Even if there were ten Hadithas, we would still not have to "prove" that we are "different from the jihadists." The idea would be offensive if it were not ludicrous.
that is, american liberty and justice for all is a truth held to be self-evident and transparent, a presumptio juris et de jure: law that cannot be rebutted or refuted with evidence. which is of course nonsense.

the NRO's W. Thomas Smith Jr. offers a sort of "delayed 'but...'," that is, what follows his "but" does not make a logical contrast with what precedes it. watch:
Now, I'm not excusing what may--with "may" being the optimum word here--prove to be a shameful day in the history of our Marine Corps. But it benefits no one if we do not attempt to understand the men involved and the dynamics of the system, and how it all could have temporarily broken down, if it did.
in other words, there's no excuse but we should understand and learn from the alleged events at haditha. huh? sorry, there's no logical contrast there, w. thomas. what you really want to say is...
Are Marine infantrymen, by virtue of the nature of their work, "cold-blooded" killers? On the contrary: It is because of the nature of their work--usually performed under extreme stress and fatigue--that Marines truly have to be some of the most moral men on the planet if they are going to be effective warriors. That doesn't mean they are flawless.
in other words, the "shit happens" defense, but this time with a unique and subtle twist: it's the very risk of shit happening that makes our soliders more moral than any other soldiers. american exceptionalism sneaks in the back door here.

here's a few from the "history will forgive us" defense, which i suppose is in some sense just a species of the american exceptionalism defense but here goes:
Like Abu Ghraib, Haditha is a war crime that should be swiftly punished. But it should not be used by opportunistic elements to tarnish all those serving in Iraq. History will be their judge, and something tells me it will treat them kindly.
--Mark Dooley, "US Army Was Betrayed By A Few 'Sadists'," The Sunday Independent (Ireland), June 4 2006

Many supporters of the wars in question are happy to see as few convictions as possible. They worry that prosecutions will poison public sentiment. This concern is overblown. What matters most to most folks back home is whether their "boys" are fighting for a just cause and whether they are winning. If the answer to both questions is yes, the public will forgive a great deal of misconduct.
-- Max Boot, "Win Baghdad and we'll forgive Haditha," Los Angeles Times, June 7 2006
actually boot's position isn't so much "history will forgive us" but "we'll forgive ourselves."

as we move further out into the lunatic fringes of the right wing, however, the apologetics get increasingly desperate. rush limbaugh goes for flat out denial and conspiracy theory:
I told you last week, the officials that know whatever in the process of this investigation cannot say a word for fear of having any conviction or any verdict thrown out because they've been involved in shaping opinion about it. So it's going to be a one-sided story. The critics are going to have a field day, and the critics are going to be able to make things up. The critics are going to be able to go out there and tell you things happened that they don't know happened. They're going to be able to use all these anonymous sources, and it's going to be -- folks, let me just put it in graphic terms. It is going to be a gang rape. There is going to be a gang rape by the Democratic Party, the American left, and the drive-by media to finally take us out in the war against Iraq. Make no bones about it.

Now, I remind you of this simply because nobody yet knows what happened in Haditha. All there are, are the horror stories right now, and if there are charges, there will be a defense. And I just -- I can't -- I cannot emphasize enough, ladies and gentlemen, the efforts that are under way and will be continuing, to use this Haditha story as the absolute final drill to destroy our effort to achieve victory in Iraq altogether. You can just -- you can see it; you can hear it. (his nationally syndicated radio program, june 5)
there is actually a shred of truth here: what we do have are allegations and not incontrovertible fact. but it's also clear that it's not critics who are making things up (a curious charge coming from a notorious fabricater like limbaugh) but the military who appear to have made things up in terms of their initial report of what happened at haditha. from the existence of allegations over incontrovertable fact, however, limbaugh proceeds to spin a paranoid vision of denial, fabrication and "gang rape."

curiously, rush is not as far out on the fringe than chris matthews, for whom killing civilians and covering it up is perfectly plausible:
Apparently, what happened in this case is they had a -- guys who went nuts, you know, they shot everybody in their family out of rage because the most popular guy in the unit had just been blown up, and then somebody said, "What good does it do to advertise this around the world?" I can see doing it for patriotic reasons, by the way. You'd say, "Why do we want the world to know we had a few mad dogs who went nuts in some house? Let's cover this baby up." (MSNBC's Hardball, June 5)
most perplexing of all tho, to me at any rate, is tony blankley's piece, "media dance macabre." i mean this is of course a guy who called george soros "a jew who figured out a way to survive the holocaust" so i don't suppose we should expect reasonable discourse from this man. and here he calls limbaugh's coinage of the phrase "drive-by media" a "a scientifically accurate description." and after a few paragraphs of fomenting rage at the media for daring to report these alleged war crimes, blankley trots out the standard "shit happens" defense but with a little shrug of wonder that more war crimes don't occur -- "It is commonplace to observe that since the dawn of man -- and currently -- in the crucible of battle, warriors sometimes cannot contain their emotions and their violent actions. It is amazing our troops act as civilized as they do in combat" -- immediately followed by the standard american exceptionalism: "No other military force in history has been so tightly limited in its defensive actions. And probably no other military force has been sufficiently disciplined to maintain such restrictive rules in the heat of combat. God bless our troops -- if not necessarily the policy that so restricts them."

um, what policy is that, not killing civilians? notice already what's happening here with this conditional "if" clause: blankley is hinting that he wishes there were no rules of engagement or code of military justice against killing civilians. he continues: "For the parents, wives, husbands and children of our young warriors who are killed because they followed the restrictive rules and didn't fire first, this is a damned bitter pill to swallow -- whatever the geopolitical wisdom of it." get it? it's a damn shame and bitter pill that soldiers cannot kill civilians in order to prevent being fired on first. this is a kind of preemptive warfare that i think would put a chill in the spines of most living breathing humans.

but don't linger over this too long because blankley is merely building up to the "of course...but" that marks all rightwing apologists for haditha:
Of course if an American soldier, sailor, Marine or airman is found by a court martial made up of seasoned officers with a practical understanding of the exigencies of combat to have violated the standards of combat, he or she must face American military justice. But in time of war, there is no reason why military censorship should not be enforced to shroud the carrying out of justice from the eager eyes and ears of enemy propagandists -- domestic and foreign.
it's stunning, really. here is blankley, a "journalist," calling for censorship. no freedom of the press in blankley's amerika: those who do open and honest reporting of facts and events in the global war on terror are nothing more than domestic enemy propagandists. here indeed is the true lunatic fringe where conservativism bends over backwards and ties itself into fascist military dicataorship, plain and simple.

(part two, on rightwing apologetics for the recent claim by the author of books called "treason" and "slander" that family members of 9/11 victims "enjoy" those deaths...)

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

1980s & 1990s best ofs

this is towards my list of best "rock" (however defined) recordings of the respective decades (and in chronological order)...

what i'm thinking might be fun is a "10 entries per decade" kinda thing, with the following restrictions: 1) no more than one entry per year, 2) three bonus entries per decade to that override the one-per-year rule, 3) bypass a given year as one sees fit, and 4) as many honorable mentions per year as one sees fit.

for example, 1991 (see below): i might choose MBV's loveless as my entry for that year but invoke nevermind as a bonus entry and give still feel gone an honorable mention.

all of which would have to be accompanied by prose explanations, justifications, makings of the case, however personal, empirical, etc.

at any rate this is all highly provisional, but heregoes....

1980s
  • the clash, london calling (1980)
  • cabaret voltaire, red mecca (1981)
  • birthday party, junkyard (1982)
  • mission of burma, VS (1982)
  • u2, war (1983)
  • the wipers, over the edge (1983)
  • echo and the bunnymen, porcupine (1983)
  • r.e.m., murmur (1983)
  • cocteau twins, treasure (1983)
  • hüsker du, zen arcade (1984)
  • minutemen, double nickels on the dime (1984)
  • title (1985)
  • xtc, skylarking (1986)
  • dinosaur, you're living all over me (1987)
  • title (1988)
  • galaxie 500, on fire (1989)
  • the pixies, doolittle (1989)
1990s
  • title (1990)
  • my bloody valentine, loveless (1991)
  • slint, spiderland (1991)
  • uncle tupelo, still feel gone (1991)
  • nirvana, nevermind (1991)
  • the wedding present, seamonsters (1992)
  • p.j. harvey, rid of me (1993)
  • fugazi, in on the kill taker (1993)
  • yo la tengo, painful (1993)
  • title (1994)
  • guided by voices, alien lanes (1995)
  • sonic youth, washing machine (1995)
  • red red meat, bunny gets paid (1995)
  • jon spencer blues explosion, now i got worry (1996)
  • archers of loaf, all the nation's airports (1996)
  • title (1997)
  • tortoise, TNT (1998)
  • title (1999)

schuyler's home book

while i already have the collected poems of james schuyler (which i picked up probably in 1997 or 1998 at atticus books in toronto), i still hang onto and/or pick up the individual volumes when i see them at a good price. a coupla years ago, for example, i found a signed copy of hymn to life at second story dupont for like four bucks.

schuyler's home bookso when i found a copy of the home book: prose and poems, 1951-1970 for half the 1977 cover price of $4.50 (that was back when gas what, what, $1.15 a gallon?) i scooped it up. and not just because of the bargain price. i figured there was bound to be some stuff not included in the collected poems and so i was essentially taking a small gamble that that stuff would be worth it.

i was not wrong. there are longer fiction-esque pieces here ("the infant jesus of prague," "current events" and the title piece), apparent non-fiction like "at home with ron padgett," wacky short plays ("the custard sellars," "mollynocket," "what to do: a problem play," "love before breakfast" and "shopping and waiting"), a journal "for joe brainard," and four prose poems: "two meditations," "father or son," "stagnation" and this one i especially like, entitled "today":

Today, hero, scented and candied like a violet, broken to a split bamboo blind, its rub a dub, ground with garbage, old hats, returns to its left breast the plate lifting hand: a lime white heart, heat smelted, whole, Ethan Brand's. A poker stirs the sky above the river, the smokestack, the mild soft drink neon sign beyond the river. Gulls faint. The tourist boat finally spools the ribbon of its passage of the island city. In the street we look up, even the pickpockets forget. It came. We're too pleased to speak of dog walkings, bags to take down, cleanings, though necessity scrubs its face. A pocket mirror serves, and the vices on the little step of each door palm, so tired, their eyes. Rainbows? Who cares! A whistler takes his thin tune past the shut fish green steepled ugly church, and too many windows to count flutter.

i love the pace here, how the sentences oscillate between paratactic stack-ups rich in sound and sense ("broken to a split bamboo blind," "a lime white heart, heat semlted, whole") to longer, hypotactic stretches of description and meditation ("A poker stirs the sky above the river, the smokestack, the mild soft drink neon sign beyond the river"). there's even something a little beat about stacked up phrases like "the mild soft drink neon sign" and "the shut fish green steepled ugly church" -- a quality i would rarely think to associate with schuyler.

"today" find schuyler approaching, as near as i've seen him but without quite matching, the highly-charged early 1950s experimentalism of o'hara and koch that i enjoy and value a great deal and makes me wonder if, anywhere in the six or so archival boxes of poetry and prose manuscripts currently housed among schuyler's papers at UCSD, there is more like it.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

george will and the politics of rectums

willthe inimitable george f. will published a rather bizarre column in the washington post yesterday marking the twenty-fifth anniversary of the CDC's first (june 5, 1981) announcement of fatalities due to what would come to be known as AIDS. with little compassion, will breezes through the evolution of the disease to an assessment of how he thinks we got to where we are and how we could have done more. it has of course given him a new opportunity to talk about the human rectum, as some bloggers have pointed out. but it's will's politics of rectums that merits closer consideration, so let's walk through it.

1) how, according to will, we got here: "In 1980s America, the enabling context included a gay community feeling more assertive and emancipated, and IV drug users sharing needles....AIDS arrived in America in the wake of the Salk vaccine, which, by swiftly defeating polio, gave Americans a misleading paradigm of how progress is made in public health." in other words, we were all lulled into a sense of complacency in thinking AIDS could be fought with a vaccine. this is of course sheer anachronism: AZT as a mere treatment drug was only approved in 1987, drug cocktails did not gain prominence until the mid-1990s, and we still do not have an HIV/AIDS vaccine today.

2) how, according to will, how we could have done more: "The U.S. epidemic, which through 2004 had killed 530,000, could have been greatly contained by intense campaigns to modify sexual and drug-use behavior in 25 to 30 neighborhoods from New York and Miami to San Francisco." of course will gives no specifics as to timeframe here, and i'm no expert but this smells fishy to me. so let's go back to 1983 and look at the record.
The number of identified cases is now over 1,400 (with four to five new cases reported every day). Of these victims, 541--or nearly 40 percent--have died. But this mortality figure is misleadingly low. Because the disease is so new, it has not run its full course in the afflicted; the statistics show that within two years after diagnosis, 80 percent have died.

This, too, is misleading, however. The cases being reported and documented by the Centers for Disease Control are only the clearcut, life-threatening ones - which may be but 5 to 10 percent of the total. This means there may be not 1,400 but actually 15,000 to 30,000 cases in the nation. But it also means that these other cases are much milder and therefore much less likely to be fatal. (Sydney H. Schanberg, "A Baffling Epidemic," The New York Times, May 24, 1983, Section A, Page 25)
This is 1983, OK? So I don't see how one could feasibly argue for the success of a containment policy a mere two years after the CDC first confirms fatalities, at which point the CDC is estimating a possible 15-30,000 actual cases.

regardless, will is really less interested in public health or compassion than he is in politics -- a politics of 1) vilifying certain sexual behaviors on moral grounds and 2) defending his beloved ronald reagan's record of silence on the matter. here's how will continues:
But early in the American epidemic, political values impeded public health requirements. Unhelpful messages were sent by slogans designed to democratize the disease -- "AIDS does not discriminate" and "AIDS is an equal opportunity disease."

By 1987, when President Ronald Reagan gave his first speech on the subject, 20,798 Americans had died, and his speech, not surprisingly, did not mention any connection to the gay community. No president considers it part of his job description to tell the country that the human rectum, with its delicate and absorptive lining, makes anal-receptive sexual intercourse dangerous when HIV is prevalent.
get it? first, it's that demon political correctness at work again: "political values impeded public health requirements" and "unhelpful messages were sent by slogans to democratize the disease." second, the gipper is above the soiling of presidential decorum that discussing rectums would entail. (this from the party that 10 years later brought us clinton blowjobs and cum-stained blue dresses!)

i know, this is a little opaque, so let's go back again into the record a bit. almost exactly 19 years that is. to a washington post column dated june 7, 1987 by one george f. will, called "AIDS: The Real Danger..."
Earnestly, and with applause from journalists, politicians are saying about AIDS: candor, regardless of the cost. But truths are being blurred because they inconvenience a political agenda and shock sensibilities. The agenda is to avoid giving offense to any groups and to avoid the accusation of "discrimination," even when the accusation is unwarranted.

In spite of much talk about the "breakout" into the general heterosexual population, AIDS still is and probably will remain predominantly a disease of homosexuals and intravenous drug users. It will decreasingly afflict educated, information-receptive homosexuals. It already is disproportionately, and will increasingly be, a disease of inner-city blacks and Hispanics.

Blacks and Hispanics, who constitute 11 and 8 percent of the population respectively, are 25 percent and 14 percent of AIDS patients. Those percentages probably will rise because AIDS is a behaviorally based disease and will disproportionately afflict those disadvantaged inner-city classes least able to acquire and act on information. After all, many people are caught in the culture of urban poverty precisely because they have never been given the basic skills of social competence: they do not regulate their behavior well, least of all in conformity with public-health bulletins.

Americans have a technology fixation generally. Regarding health, their thinking is shaped by the polio paradigm, the conquest of disease by Dr. Salk's silver bullet. But America's principal public-health problems flow from foolish behavior regarding eating, drinking, smoking, driving -- and, with AIDS, abuse of the body, especially the rectum.
i won't hold will's inability to predict the future correctly in his second paragraph -- in fact, as it was reported by the CDC in 1994, "Since AIDS was recognized in 1981, the proportion of people contracting the deadly virus from heterosexual sex has increased more than tenfold - from less than 1 percent to almost 10 percent of the total AIDS cases, the CDC said in its annual update. Conversely, the proportion of men getting AIDS from having sex with other men has decreased from 75 percent to 47 percent of all cases" (Anne Rochell, "Heterosexual AIDs rate up sharply," Atlanta Journal and Constitution, March 11, 1994, page A1).

nor will i take him to task for his inherently elitist, classicist and possibly racist assertion that "many people are caught in the culture of urban poverty precisely because they have never been given the basic skills of social competence," which assumes they do not innately possess such skills and cannot obtain them of their own will and volition but instead must be "given" them, presumably by the likes of will himself. nor will i challenge his polio analogy, which he's obviously still trying to get mileage out of today but is just as specious (and really boils down to the classic conservative tenet that people are bad).

no, more immediately relevant is will's claim, here in 1987 and essentially reiterated unchanged 19 years later, is that political correctness and the need "to avoid giving offense to any groups" prevents us from having a frank public discussion of AIDS, from calling it what will obviously thinks it is in 1987 and presumably today: a "gay disease" afflicting ethnic minorities and sexual and moral degenerates. political correctness won't let commentators like will tell us straight up what it all boils down to: abuse of the rectum.
Most journalism about AIDS reflects social and political squeamishness. In addition to an understandable reluctance to discuss certain sexual matters, journalism is infused with liberal values, [sign of the times: you'd never see will putting these two words together today] including abhorrence of "discrimination," which is defined (indiscriminately) to include all invidious distinctions among social groups, particularly those, such as homosexuals, that have a history of being badly treated.

Journalism seems reluctant to clarify that the primary reason for the AIDS epidemic is that the rectum, with its delicate and absorptive lining, is not suited to homosexual uses. [oh but does george discuss the delicate and absorptive lining of the rectum with RELISH or what?] The nation needs unsparing journalism of the sort found in the Chicago Tribune Magazine of April 26:
"...81.5 percent of the second cluster of AIDS patients had engaged in the practice called 'fisting,' which causes rectal trauma, in the years before they fell ill. The researchers defined fisting as the insertion of a portion of the hand -- or even the entire fist -- into the anus of another person. The 27 men studied had a median of 120 sexual partners during the year before the onset of symptoms, with one man reporting up to 250 sexual partners in each of the three years before symptoms."
Without here adding details about dildos and enemas, [oh george, please do!] suffice it to say that the data suggest that receptive anal intercourse is the major, if not the only, important exposure by which homosexuals acquire the infection. In many cities, homosexual organizations have effectively taken the lead in distributing information about safe sexual practices. And, of course, not all homosexuals are promiscuous or given to high-risk behavior. However, even some who are not are dismayed by dissemination of information about those who are. And insufficient information about homosexual practices has impeded understanding of the epidemic.
in other words, journalists should just talk more often and more frankly about FISTING! i mean this is the so-called "liberal media" we're talking about, right george? if the "liberal media" would just provide us with sufficient information about sexual acts such as fisting, we could have a more open and honest dialogue about AIDS and AIDS public policy?

of course, this makes no sense. what will is really saying is that if the SCLM would openly and frankly "clarify that the primary reason for the AIDS epidemic is that the rectum, with its delicate and absorptive lining, is not suited to homosexual uses," then we could all publicly and shamelessly practice the discrimination against the ethnic minorities and sexual deviants who are the ultimate cause of all this!

"And, of course," will writes, the "of course" always acting as pseudo-qualifier, the obligatory nod to moderation, compassion and decency that in reality lies in stark contrast with the conservative's true feelings, "not all homosexuals are promiscuous or given to high-risk behavior," even though will goes right ahead and reinforces such stereotypes anyway.

Of course anyone with AIDS deserves care and compassion. Of course testing is acceptable, if only marginally important, for applicants for marriage licenses and citizenship, and for prisoners. (Many rapes are homosexual rapes in prison.) But while it is politically safe and socially soothing to pretend that AIDS is now a democratic, meaning universal, disease threatening us all equally, that is false.

So is the notion that the most urgent task is to fund research for a vaccine. Of course research should be funded generously, but dollars spent getting addicts off needles and onto methadone will do more good, as will journalism that does not trim the truth to spare our feelings.
right: there is no equal, universal risk (in fact third worlders are now at greater risk than they were then), and funding research for a vaccine is not our most urgent task (fund it generously he says, but if not for a cure then for what?), it's telling people the truth about FISTING that's so vital and urgent!

so the moralism, hypocrisy, sensationalism and fear in such a position are evident enough, but what about the politics? what happened to reagan in all this? recall will's little history lesson from yesterday's column:

By 1987, when President Ronald Reagan gave his first speech on the subject, 20,798 Americans had died, and his speech, not surprisingly, did not mention any connection to the gay community. No president considers it part of his job description to tell the country that the human rectum, with its delicate and absorptive lining, makes anal-receptive sexual intercourse dangerous when HIV is prevalent.
fortunately for us and for god-fearing sex-hating conservatives everywhere, will is all too willing to include this in his own job description. what's more here interesting is how will is defending reagan's silence as a matter of decorum. he says "not surprisingly" reagan's speech "did not mention any connection to the gay community," which i find highly curious. on one level, it's indeed no surprise that reagan would not highlight homosexuals in such a speech, because conservative moralists of all stripes were doing it for him and with a vengeance. while i don't have time to track down what other conservative moralists like bauer, bennett, buchanan, falwell, and robertson have said, william f. buckley for one proposed, in a march 18, 1986 new york times column, that "Everyone detected with AIDS should be tatooed [sic] in the upper forearm, to protect common-needle users, and on the buttocks, to prevent the victimization of other homosexuals." and why would reagan go against this crowd when they're the ones bankrolling him and his party?

essentially, will is trying to make a virtue out of reagan's notorious silence with respect to AIDS. but in maintaining a virtuous silence, isn't reagan falling prey to the very political correctness that will decries?